Gnomon Knows

Posted by Edwin VanGorder | Sun Oct 11th 2015 8:36 a.m.
notes fashioned around my perception That Tod Cronan’s idea that while semiotics as an understanding of phenomena from within the very reading as subject is true enough it is not sufficient for his need to verify effective judgements, that the thesis antithesis then is opposition fashioned against what is said to be affective or merely compelling arguments too mechanical to be said to elect cognitive immersion to a fair extent of representing humanity.
My antithesis to his is that simulacrae out of which he fashions representation towards cognitive dialectic does not sufficiently fathom that the fallout of dialectic as oppositional pairs is discourse which marks a manifold projected by those human factors of ethos and pathos.
Your Reply